Thermo-hydraulic performance characteristics of novel G-Prime and FRD Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) geometries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient thermal management is crucial for numerous applications, from electronics cooling and automobile systems to aerospace systems, necessitating the exploration of advanced heat transfer technologies like TPMS structures. Compared to conventional heat exchangers and heat sinks, lattice structures have improved by around 20–30 % performance. However, the variation in performance of the various lattice structures, such as FRD, G-Prime, etc., is yet unknown. Thus, this study investigates the thermo-hydraulic performance of various Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) structures, including novel G-Prime and FRD geometries, through numerical simulations and experimental validation. The TPMS geometries were modeled using LattGen software and voxelized with 20 % relative density. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using Ansys Fluent with the k-epsilon turbulence model, and experiments were conducted on 3D-printed samples for validation. The numerical results reveal that G-Prime-2 and FRD Prime exhibit the highest heat transfer performance while demonstrating higher pressure drops than other TPMS geometries. Experimental validation agrees with numerical predictions, confirming the superior thermo-hydraulic performance of G-Prime-2 and FRD Prime for heat transfer enhancement applications. The results contribute to understanding TPMS thermo-hydraulic performance and enable informed geometry selection for thermal management applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".