HIV-1 N-myristoylation-dependent hijacking of late endosomes/lysosomes to drive Gag assembly in macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macrophages represent an important viral reservoir in HIV-1-infected individuals. Different from T cells, HIV-1 assembly in macrophages occurs at intracellular compartments termed virus-containing compartments (VCCs). Our previous research in HeLa cells - in which assembly resembles that found in infected T cells - suggested that late endosomes/lysosomes (LELs) play a role in HIV-1 trafficking towards its assembly sites. However, the role of LELs during assembly at VCCs is not fully understood. Herein, we used the HIV-1-inducible cell line THP-1 GagZip as a model to study HIV-1 Gag intracellular trafficking and assembly in macrophages. We demonstrated LEL involvement at VCCs using various microscopy techniques and biochemical approaches. Live-cell imaging revealed that HIV-1 repositions LELs towards the plasma membrane and modulates their motility. We showed that Arl8b-mediated LEL repositioning is not responsible for Gag trafficking to VCCs. Additionally, the inhibition of myristoylation by PCLX-001 decreased the presence of Gag on endosomes and inhibited VCC formation in both the THP-1 cell line and primary macrophages. In conclusion, we present evidence supporting the idea that HIV-1 manipulates the LEL trajectory to guide Gag to VCCs in an N-myristoylation-dependent manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".