MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403703149 · doi:10.1021/acssensors.4c01677

“Binding” or “Binding and Switching”? A Perspective on Resolving Conformational Changes of Surface-Attached Biomolecular Receptors

2024· review· en· W4403703149 on OpenAlexafffund
Lisa Deflandre, Philippe Dauphin‐Ducharme

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sensors · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReceptorBiophysicsChemistryConformational changePerspective (graphical)Plasma protein bindingNanotechnologyBiochemistryMaterials scienceBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the structural reconfiguration of a biomolecular receptor remains a topic of particular interest to the biosensing community. This is because conformationally changing receptors are commonly employed in biosensors to harness their capability to bind specifically to their target. Often, such receptors are attached to surfaces so that binding can be transduced into a measurable response. Doing so, however, can impose constraints on the possible configurations they can adopt. Such constraints can ultimately influence, for example, their receptor-target binding models or their affinity, which is essential to provide the desired analytical performances in biosensors. Motivated by the idea of gaining further insights into the impact of surface attachment on conformationally switching receptors attached to surfaces, we explore here the various surface-based techniques capable of monitoring structural changes. We decided to narrow our survey to techniques that have been applied to the investigation of nucleic acids to provide an overview of their key features. We envision that this will bring a broader perspective of the field and the challenges ahead with the hopes of "finding the switch" in surface-attached biomolecular receptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS SensorsSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207