MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403704094 · doi:10.1093/brain/awae303

Delineating three distinct spatiotemporal patterns of brain atrophy in Parkinson’s disease

2024· article· en· W4403704094 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yusuke Sakato, Atsushi Shima, Yuta Terada, Kiyoaki Takeda, Haruhi Sakamaki‐Tsukita, Akira Nishida, Kenji Yoshimura, Ikko Wada, Koji Furukawa, Daisuke Kambe, Hiroki Togo, Yohei Mukai, Masanori Sawamura, Etsuro Nakanishi, Hodaka Yamakado, Yasutaka Fushimi, Tomohisa Okada, Yuji Takahashi, Yuji Nakamoto, Ryōsuke Takahashi, Takashi Hanakawa, Nobukatsu Sawamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Science and Technology AgencyTakeda CanadaBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaAllerganGE HealthcareH. Lundbeck A/SServierCerevel TherapeuticsGlaxoSmithKline foundationGenentechWeston Family FoundationRoche EspañaAbbVieDenali TherapeuticsUniversidade Católica de BrasíliaVoyager TherapeuticsAligning Science Across Parkinson’sAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsMerck KGaANeurocrine BiosciencesTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesVerily Life SciencesAmathus TherapeuticsMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchPfizerBiogenBiohaven PharmaceuticalsCelgeneJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentSanofi Australia
KeywordsNeurodegenerationAtrophyNeocortexNeuroscienceAmygdalaTemporal cortexStriatumPutamenBrainstemPsychologyBasal gangliaPathologyDiseaseMedicineCentral nervous systemDopamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The clinical manifestation of Parkinson's disease exhibits significant heterogeneity in the prevalence of non-motor symptoms and the rate of progression of motor symptoms, suggesting that Parkinson's disease can be classified into distinct subtypes. In this study, we aimed to explore this heterogeneity by identifying a set of subtypes with distinct patterns of spatiotemporal trajectories of neurodegeneration. We applied Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn), an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that combined disease progression modelling with clustering methods, to cortical and subcortical neurodegeneration visible on 3 T structural MRI of a large cross-sectional sample of 504 patients and 279 healthy controls. Serial longitudinal data were available for a subset of 178 patients at the 2-year follow-up and for 140 patients at the 4-year follow-up. In a subset of 210 patients, concomitant Alzheimer's disease pathology was assessed by evaluating amyloid-β concentrations in the CSF or via the amyloid-specific radiotracer 18F-flutemetamol with PET. The SuStaIn analysis revealed three distinct subtypes, each characterized by unique patterns of spatiotemporal evolution of brain atrophy: neocortical, limbic and brainstem. In the neocortical subtype, a reduction in brain volume occurred in the frontal and parietal cortices in the earliest disease stage and progressed across the entire neocortex during the early stage, although with relative sparing of the striatum, pallidum, accumbens area and brainstem. The limbic subtype represented comparative regional vulnerability, which was characterized by early volume loss in the amygdala, accumbens area, striatum and temporal cortex, subsequently spreading to the parietal and frontal cortices across disease stage. The brainstem subtype showed gradual rostral progression from the brainstem extending to the amygdala and hippocampus, followed by the temporal and other cortices. Longitudinal MRI data confirmed that 77.8% of participants at the 2-year follow-up and 84.0% at the 4-year follow-up were assigned to subtypes consistent with estimates from the cross-sectional data. This three-subtype model aligned with empirically proposed subtypes based on age at onset, because the neocortical subtype demonstrated characteristics similar to those found in the old-onset phenotype, including older onset and cognitive decline symptoms (P < 0.05). Moreover, the subtypes correspond to the three categories of the neuropathological consensus criteria for symptomatic patients with Lewy pathology, proposing neocortex-, limbic- and brainstem-predominant patterns as different subgroups of α-synuclein distributions. Among the subtypes, the prevalence of biomarker evidence of amyloid-β pathology was comparable. Upon validation, the subtype model might be applied to individual cases, potentially serving as a biomarker to track disease progression and predict temporal evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207