MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403707420 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdae175

In situ optical feedback in brain tumor biopsy: A multiparametric analysis

2024· article· en· W4403707420 on OpenAlexaff
Elisabeth Klint, Johan Richter, Peter Milos, Martin Hallbeck, Karin Wårdell

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsEngineering Link (Canada)
FundersLinköpings UniversitetStiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
KeywordsIn situBiopsyMetric (unit)Computer scienceMedicineRadiologyChemistryEngineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Brain tumor needle biopsy interventions are inflicted with nondiagnostic or biased sampling in up to 25% and hemorrhage, including asymptomatic cases, in up to 60%. To identify diagnostic tissue and sites with increased microcirculation, intraoperative optical techniques have been suggested. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical implications of in situ optical guidance in frameless navigated tumor biopsies. Methods Real-time feedback on protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence, microcirculation, and gray-whiteness was given before tissue sampling (272 positions) in 20 patients along 21 trajectories in total. The primary variables of investigation were fluorescence in relation to neuropathological findings and gadolinium (Gd) enhancement, increased cerebral microcirculation in relation to bleeding incidence, number of trajectories, and impact on operation time. Results PpIX fluorescence was detected in Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype CNS WHO grade 4 (n = 12), Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 3), astrocytoma IDH-mutated CNS WHO grade 4 (n = 1) (Ki67 indices ≥ 15%). For 2 patients, no PpIX fluorescence or Gd was found, although samples contained tumorous tissue (Ki67 index 6%). Increased microcirculation was found along 9 trajectories (34 sites), located in cortical, tumorous, or tentorium regions. Postoperative bleedings (n = 10, nine asymptomatic) were related to skull opening or tissue sampling. This study strengthens the proposed independence from intraoperative neuropathology as PpIX fluorescence is detected. Objective real-time feedback resulted in fewer trajectories compared to previous studies indicating reduced operation time. Conclusions The integrated optical guidance system provides real-time feedback in situ, increasing certainty and precision of diagnostic tissue before sampling during frameless brain tumor biopsies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207