MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation of a finite state machine algorithm to measure stepping with ankle accelerometry: Performance across a range of gait speeds, tasks, and individual walking ability

2024· article· en· W4403711764 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin Cornish, Karen Van Ooteghem, Matthew H. Wong, Kyle S Weber, Frederico Pieruccini‐Faria, Manuel Montero‐Odasso, William E. McIlroy

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Engineering & Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Institute on AgingNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of OntarioOntario Brain Institute
KeywordsAccelerometerGaitMeasure (data warehouse)Range (aeronautics)Computer scienceAnkleAlgorithmFinite-state machineSimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationEngineeringMedicineData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Wearable sensors increasingly used to assess gait in clinic and community settings. • Detection algorithms need high accuracy across range of abilities and conditions. • Finite state machines have advantages over threshold-based step detection methods. • FSM method reports excellent detection accuracy for speed and dual task conditions. • Potential advantages for expanding to free-living are favourable for FSM methods. Wearable sensors, including accelerometers, are a widely accepted tool to assess gait in clinical and free-living environments. Methods to identify phases and subphases of the gait cycle are necessary for comprehensive assessment of pathological gait. The current study evaluated the accuracy of a finite state machine (FSM) algorithm to detect strides by identifying gait cycle subphases from ankle-worn accelerometry. Algorithm performance was challenged across a range of speeds (0.4-2.6 m/s), task conditions (e.g., single- and dual-task walking), and individual characteristics. Specifically, the study included a range of treadmill speeds in young adults and overground walking conditions in older adults with neurological disease. Manually counted and algorithm-derived stride detection from acceleration data were evaluated using error analysis and Bland-Altman plots for visualization. Overall, the algorithm successfully detected strides (>96 % accuracy) across gait speed ranges and tasks, for young and older adults. The accuracy of an FSM algorithm combined with ankle-worn accelerometers, provides an analytical approach with affordable and portable tools that permits comprehensive assessment of gait unbounded by setting and proves to perform well in in walking tasks characterized by variable walking. These algorithm capabilities and advancements are critical for identifying phase dependent gait impairments in clinical and free-living assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Engineering & PhysicsSame topicBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrench-language works237,207