Integrated study of hydraulic/CO2 fracturing and production coupled with a THM-D process in ultra-shallow shale reservoirs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To explore fracturing technology for vertical wells in ultra-shallow shale gas reservoirs, a coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-damage (THM-D) fracturing and production integration model is established in this study. In addition, a new coupled hydro-mechanical damage model is established to calculate fracture evolution. These two models are validated through theoretical models and field data, respectively. Based on these models, the quality of fracturing under different geological parameters, fracturing parameters, and fracturing technology is compared and analyzed. The results show that the distribution of natural fractures significantly influences fracturing and production. In addition, due to the high leak-off in the ultra-shallow shale reservoir, the total fracture length and cumulative production after 720 days of carbon dioxide fracturing are only 70.35% and 77.26% of the values achieved by hydraulic fracturing, respectively. Therefore, it is necessary to consider reducing carbon dioxide leak-off in the design of carbon dioxide fracturing in ultra-shallow shale reservoirs. Fracturing efficiency also should be considered when designing fracturing time. When the injection rate is 5 m 3 /min, the efficiency drops sharply if the fracturing time exceeds 67.45 min. The production of hydraulic fracturing and carbon dioxide fractured wells has also been studied when fracturing methods without proppant are used. This study found that a satisfactory production rate can also be achieved in ultra-shallow shale gas reservoirs when fracturing without proppant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it