Ensemble-Enhanced Semi-Supervised Learning With Optimized Graph Construction for High-Dimensional Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph-based methods have demonstrated exceptional performance in semi-supervised classification. However, existing graph-based methods typically construct either a predefined graph in the original space or an adaptive graph within the output space, which often limits their ability to fully utilize prior information and capture the optimal intrinsic data distribution, particularly in high-dimensional data with abundant redundant and noisy features. This paper introduces a novel approach: Semi-Supervised Classification with Optimized Graph Construction (SSC-OGC). SSC-OGC leverages both predefined and adaptive graphs to explore intrinsic data distribution and effectively employ prior information. Additionally, a graph constraint regularization term (GCR) and a collaborative constraint regularization term (CCR) are incorporated to further enhance the quality of the adaptive graph structure and the learned subspace, respectively. To eliminate the negative effect of constructing a predefined graph in the original data space, we further propose a Hybrid Subspace Ensemble-enhanced framework based on the proposed Optimized Graph Construction method (HSE-OGC). Specifically, we construct multiple hybrid subspaces, which consist of meticulously chosen features from the original data to achieve high-quality and diverse space representations. Then, HSE-OGC constructs multiple predefined graphs within hybrid subspaces and trains multiple SSC-OGC classifiers to complement each other, significantly improving the overall performance. Experimental results conducted on various high-dimensional datasets demonstrate that HSE-OGC exhibits outstanding performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".