MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403722312 · doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3481211

Latent Code Description for Unsupervised AHU Fault Detection Using Adaptive Adversarial Autoencoder

2024· article· en· W4403722312 on OpenAlexaff
Viet Tra, Manar Amayri, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderFault detection and isolationAdversarial systemComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCode (set theory)Fault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Unsupervised learningDeep learningGeologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Timely fault detection in HVAC systems is crucial for preventing energy waste and maintaining thermal comfort in commercial buildings. This paper introduces the adaptive adversarial autoencoder (AdaAAE), an innovative anomaly detection approach designed for unsupervised fault detection within air handling units (AHUs) of HVAC systems. By combining the adversarial autoencoder (AAE) with deep support vector data description (DSVDD), AdaAAE efficiently trains the reconstruction, regularization, and compactness phases to produce a spherical and compact latent representation of the training data, enabling effective fault detection within the latent space. A key feature of AdaAAE is its ability to accurately determine the anomaly threshold at the end of the training phase, which is particularly beneficial in scenarios where there is no prior knowledge of the anomaly ratio for test instances—a common challenge in real-world applications. AdaAAE’s performance was evaluated on a real-world AHU system developed as part of the ASHRAE research project 1312 (RP-1312). Experimental results, especially with regard to AUC-ROC and AUC-PR, highlight AdaAAE’s superior fault detection capabilities across AHU datasets with varying complexities. Notably, AdaAAE achieved outstanding performance, with an average AUC-ROC of 97.5% and AUC-PR of 94.4%, significantly outperforming the baseline methods in this study. Additionally, the experimental findings demonstrate AdaAAE’s proficiency in accurately estimating the anomaly threshold without prior knowledge, with minimal performance degradation when shifting from a scenario with a known anomaly ratio to one requiring estimation.Note to Practitioners—The concept of anomaly detection through subspace learning has attracted significant interest, with a focus on achieving a compact latent distribution. In this study, we introduce a new anomaly detection technique called AdaAAE, which is designed to produce a spherical and compact latent representation of training data. This feature enhances the method’s ability to identify anomalies within the latent space. Moreover, AdaAAE offers a distinct advantage in accurately determining the anomaly threshold at the end of the training phase, which is especially useful in practical scenarios where prior information about anomaly ratios for test instances is unavailable. To ensure reproducibility and allow for future enhancements by other researchers, the entire source code for this study is available in the following repository: https://github.com/viettra-xai/Ada-AAE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207