NRI-TL Metamaterial Leaky-Wave Antenna With Off-Broadside Zero Beam-Squinting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Presented is the analysis and design of a leaky-wave antenna (LWA) that radiates an off-broadside beam with zero beam-squinting (ZBS), operating at a frequency of 5.5 GHz. A general design methodology is presented, which can be used to design any fixed-beam leaky-wave antenna with different design requirements. Two oppositely-directed branches of LWAs utilizing negative-refractive-index transmission-line (NRI-TL) metamaterials are employed in the design. To achieve off-broadside radiation with zero beam-squinting, it is necessary for one branch to operate within the left-handed region, while the other branch to operate within the right-handed region. A 50-ohm microstrip line is used to feed the two NRI-TL LWAs which radiate two appositively directed beams whose combination results in a wideband off-broadside beam. The antenna was validated experimentally, and its fixed-beam operation was achieved for approximately a 20% fractional bandwidth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".