MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S3259 Drinking Piping Hot Tea Increases Risk of Esophageal Cancer

2024· article· en· W4403727105 on OpenAlexaff
Taleen A Ashikian, Manuel E Babaian

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTea Polyphenols and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePipingEsophageal cancerEnvironmental healthCancerInternal medicineEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus usually has been historically associated with well described risk factors. Here we present a patient who developed malignancy in the absence of most of the known risk factors except for admitted prolonged use of very hot beverages. Case Description/Methods: Our patient is a 73-year-old woman who previously had no significant existing medical conditions, who complained of slow progressing dysphagia to mostly solid food for a few weeks. The patient then underwent EGD which revealed a 3 cm sub-obstructing lesion in the proximal esophagus (see image attached) and biopsies confirmed moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with local invasion. The patient underwent a combination of chemo and radiation therapy which successfully irradicated the lesion as proven on a subsequent endoscopy. Discussion: Upon further more detailed questioning, the patient specifically denied any smoking or alcohol use at any point in her life. Being from the region of the Caucasus, the patient did admit to prolonged daily use of very hot tea since her teenage years. Epidemiologic studies have shown an increase in risk of developing esophageal cancer while using hot beverages over prolonged period. In particular, there was a large meta-analysis which reviewed 536 articles in 2009 from the International Journal of Cancer. After inclusion criteria were met, 77 articles were studied. This revealed that high/temperature beverage drinking increases the risk of esophageal cancer. Individuals from certain parts of the world that are known to consume very hot beverages including tea and coffee should be screened for and given recommendations to modify their behavior to reduce the risk of further irritation of the esophagus (see Figure 1). Reference: F. Islami et al, High-Temperature beverages and Foods and Esophageal Cancer Risk - A Systematic Review, 2009, August 1;125(3): 491-524.Figure 1.: Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicTea Polyphenols and EffectsFrench-language works237,207