MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403732074 · doi:10.54195/eirj.15838

Exceptions to the binding force of a debtor’s arbitration agreement on the Insolvency Practitioner

2023· article· en· W4403732074 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bork Reinhard

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Insolvency and Restructuring Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in South Africa
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebtorInsolvencyArbitrationBusinessBankruptcyAgreementLawCreditorPolitical scienceFinanceDebtPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this decision, the Canadian Supreme Court had to decide whether an insolvency administrator is bound by an arbitration agreement entered into by the insolvency debtor prior to the commencement of insolvency proceedings and, therefore, whether civil proceedings incompatible with this arbitration agreement must be stayed before the state courts. The court affirms the binding nature of arbitration in principle, but allows an exception in the event that the reference to arbitration would be incompatible with the conduct of proper and efficient insolvency proceedings

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.094
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.094
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.015
Scholarly communication0.0150.005
Open science0.0060.009
Research integrity0.0260.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Insolvency and Restructuring JournalSame topicLegal Issues in South AfricaFrench-language works237,207