MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HUELLAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN ESCOLAR MONOCULTURAL DEL SIGLO XX: DESDE LAS VOCES DE SABIOS Y SABIAS MAPUCHES EN LA ARAUCANÍA, CHILE

2024· article· es· W4403733225 on OpenAlexaff
Katerin Arias-Ortega, Andrea Valenzuela, Carlo Prévil

Bibliographic record

VenueDiálogo andino · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ResumenEl artculo expone resultados de investigacin sobre el sentido de la escuela en contexto indgena, desde las voces de sabios mapuches de La Araucana, Chile.Los sabios y sabias mapuches son reconocidos por la comunidad por ser quienes conocen la historia social, cultural y familiar de su pueblo, as como su lengua y su cultura.Son quienes transmiten a las nuevas generaciones la memoria social mapuche.La metodologa es cualitativa desde un enfoque descriptivo, se trabaj entrevistas en profundidad con 12 sabios y sabias indgenas mapuche, quienes vivieron procesos de escolarizacin formal en colegios monoculturales chilenos.Su edad flucta entre 40 y 70 aos y todos son hablantes de su lengua verncula mapuche (mapunzugun).La tcnica de anlisis de la informacin fue el anlisis temtico, permitiendo relevar categoras de contenidos centrales que emergen del discurso de los participantes y que permiten comprender el sentido de la escuela y sus huellas en contexto mapuche.Concluimos que es urgente visibilizar los traumas psicolgicos, fsicos y afectivos que ha dejado la escuela, producto de las prcticas de blanqueamiento y genocidio cultural.Esto, como una oportunidad para avanzar en la reparacin y reconciliacin entre los sujetos indgenas y no indgenas

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiálogo andinoSame topicCultural and Social Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207