MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403735048 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.4c03547

Hybrid 3D Vertical Graphene Nanoflake and Aligned Carbon Nanotube Architectures for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Ion Batteries

2024· article· en· W4403735048 on OpenAlexaff
Tong-Bao Lv, Yu Dai, Long Tan, Jing-Jian Zhang, Zhi-Qing Zhao, Kang-Ming Liao, Haoyu Wang, Shuguang Deng, Guiping Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGrapheneMaterials scienceLithium (medication)Carbon nanotubeIonNanotechnologyNanotubeEnergy densityCarbon fibersComposite numberEngineering physicsChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, we synthesized a type of three-dimensional (3D) carbon nanostructure through the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition method, which was composed of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene nanoflakes (GNFs) embedded on the surface of CNTs. The CNTs have a typical hollow structure with an inner diameter of 15 nm, and the CNT@GNF were grown on vermiculite supported with an Fe–Mo catalyst. The diameter of CNTs and the amount of GNFs on the CNT surface can be controlled by adjusting the reaction time, radio frequency (RF) power, and growth temperature. The continuous bombardment of plasma results in a large number of defects on the surface of the CNTs. It was further confirmed that the radio frequency (RF) power played a key role on the generation of GNFs by providing sufficient carbon sources and creating defects as the active sites on surface of the CNTs. Moreover, small amounts (1.2%) of synthesized CNT@GNF material after purification were employed as an efficient conductive agent for the cathode with high contents of LiFePO 4 (LFP) up to 95.8%. As a result, the CNT@GNF-based LFP electrode showed a superior electrochemical performance. After 450 cycles at a current density of 0.5 C, the battery exhibited a specific capacity of 100 mAh g –1, corresponding to a capacity retention rate of 87%. Additionally, a discharge capacity of 61 mAh g –1 can still be achieved at 10 C. The largely improved electrochemical performance should be ascribed to the well-established conductive networks by the CNT@GNF material in the electrode. Overall, we synthesized nanocarbons with a unique structure in a facile way, which is promising for the application in lithium-ion batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207