Najstarsze kościoły ziemi zatorskiej na tle wykazu parafi i dekanatu zatorskiego z lat 1325 -1327
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE OLDEST CHURCHES IN THE LAND OF ZATOR AGAINST THE LIST OF PARISHES OF THE DECANATE OF ZATOR FROM 1325 -1327 The author considers the relationship between the decanate of Zator which appears in 1325, and the land of Zator, known mainly from sources from the 15th century. The decanate of Zator, as an administrative unit of the Diocese of Cracow, covered the areas of the later lan of Zator and the areas located on the Skawina river and north of the Wisla. The list from the years 1325 -1327 contains mentions of 23 oldest churches in the land of Zator. The author analyzes the source records concerning all the churches in the land of Zator listed in this list. The oldest churches were probably erected before 1178, that is, when the area in question was still part of the province of Cracow. These were probably churches in Zator, Mucharz and Woźniki. Their founders were the 12th century princes of Cracow. The second wave of the creation of churches is associated with the activities of the dukes of Opole and Oświęcim. They founded churches in Polanka Wielka, Spytkowice, Piotrowice, Przeciszów, Gierałtowice, Jaroszowice, Barwałd Dolny, Głębowice and Wadowice (13th century – fi rst quarter of the 14th century). The churches in Graboszyce, Wieprz, Witanowice, Nidek, Radocza, Zygodowice, Inwałd and Palczowice can hypothetically be included in knightly foundations. Among them were 3 multi -village parishes (Mucharz, Zator and Krzęcin), however, single -village parishes predominated in numbers. Among these churches, the invocations of St. Mary of the Virgin predominate. George, All Saints, St. Peter and Paul, St. John the Baptist, St. Martin, St. Mary Magdalene, St. Nicholas, St. Michael the Archangel, St. Andrew, St. Simon and Jude, St. Clement and St. Jacob.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".