MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403754571 · doi:10.1002/anse.202400056

Functional Nucleic Acids as Bacterial Biosensors: A Focus on <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection

2024· article· en· W4403754571 on OpenAlexafffund
Y. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalysis & Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsClostridioidesNucleic acidMicrobiologyFocus (optics)BiologyComputational biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clostridioides difficile (CD) is a Gram‐positive, anaerobic, and spore‐forming bacillus that colonizes the human gut and causes a range of diseases, such as pseudomembranous colitis and antibiotic‐associated diarrhea, that are generally known as CD infection (CDI). Rapid and accurate detection of CDI with high sensitivity and specificity is crucial for patient treatment, infection control, and epidemiological monitoring. Current diagnostic methods for CDI have several limitations, such as high cost, long turnaround time, suboptimal sensitivity, and the need for specialized equipment. Hence, novel detection methods that can overcome these limitations are needed. Functional nucleic acids (FNAs) are a promising class of molecular recognition element (MRE) that can be incorporated into biosensors for detecting infectious pathogens. Several FNAs have been developed for detecting CD. In this review, an overview of CD, CDI, and current diagnostic methods for CDI and their drawbacks are provided. Furthermore, the design principles and working mechanisms of FNAs as well as their applications for the detection of pathogenic bacteria, including CD, are discussed. The potential for developing point‐of‐care paper sensors using currently available CD‐selective FNAs is also highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalysis & SensingSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207