Ethylene and epoxyethane metabolism in methanotrophic bacteria: comparative genomics and physiological studies using Methylohalobius crimeensis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genome of the methanotrophic bacterium Methylohalobius crimeensis strain 10Ki contains a gene cluster that encodes a putative coenzyme-M (CoM)-dependent pathway for oxidation of epoxyethane, based on homology to genes in bacteria that grow on ethylene and propylene as sole substrates. An alkene monooxygenase was not detected in the M. crimeensis genome, so epoxyethane is likely produced from co-oxidation of ethylene by the methane monooxygenase enzyme. Similar gene clusters were detected in about 10% of available genomes from aerobic methanotrophic bacteria, primarily strains grown from rice paddies and other wetlands. The sparse occurrence of the gene cluster across distant phylogenetic groups suggests that multiple lateral gene transfer events have occurred in methanotrophs. In support of this, the gene cluster in M. crimeensis was detected within a large genomic island predicted using multiple methods. Growth studies, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and proteomics were performed to examine the expression of these genes in M. crimeensis . Growth and methane oxidation activity were completely inhibited by the addition of >0.5% (v/v) ethylene to the headspace of cultures, but at 0.125% and below, the inhibition was only partial, and ethylene was gradually oxidized. The etnE gene encoding epoxyalkane:CoM transferase was strongly upregulated in ethylene-exposed cells based on RT-qPCR. Proteomics analysis confirmed that EtnE and nine other proteins encoded in the same gene cluster became much more predominant after cells were exposed to ethylene. The results suggest that ethylene is strongly inhibitory to M. crimeensis , but the bacterium responds to ethylene exposure by expressing an epoxide oxidation system similar to that used by bacteria that grow on alkenes. In the obligate methanotroph M. crimeensis , this system does not facilitate growth on ethylene but likely alleviates toxicity of epoxyethane formed through ethylene co-oxidation by particulate methane monooxygenase. The presence of predicted epoxide detoxification systems in several other wetland methanotrophs suggests that co-oxidation of ambient ethylene presents a stress for methanotrophic bacteria in these environments and that epoxyethane removal has adaptive value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".