BCS-BEC crossover of the strongly interacting <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>Li</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mtext>−</mml:mtext> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>40</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> mixture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present quantum Monte Carlo calculations of the properties of a two-component mass-imbalanced Fermi gas, corresponding to the $^{6}\mathrm{Li}\text{\ensuremath{-}}^{40}\mathrm{K}$ mixture. We compute the equation of state of the unpolarized system as a function of the scattering length with particular attention paid to the unitary limit, where the effect of the effective range of the interaction is explored. In order to investigate differences from the equal-mass case we also compute the pair-distribution function and the momentum distribution over a range of interaction strengths, which can provide information about the structure of the system. Finally, we compute the heavy-light quasiparticle spectrum for the full crossover regime. Our theoretical predictions, based on quantum Monte Carlo calculations, should inform future theoretical studies and can be tested by experiments with ultracold fermionic gases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".