MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403766872 · doi:10.1080/17460794.2024.2394381

Eight-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Canadian hepatitis C virus-infected, treatment-naïve, compensated cirrhotic people: CREST study

2024· article· en· W4403766872 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brian Conway, Curtis Cooper, Roger Gaertner, Veeral Gandhi, Shariq Haider, Lindsay Myles, Kris Stewart, Alexander Wong, Alnoor Ramji

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Virology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Intestinal ResearchUniversity of SaskatchewanHamilton Health SciencesBarrie Urology GroupJuravinski HospitalVancouver Native Health SocietyABB (Canada)Ottawa HospitalSimon Fraser University
FundersAbbVie
KeywordsHepatitis C virusCrestHepatitis a virusInternal medicineVirologyMedicineGastroenterologyHepatitis CVirusPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Evaluation of the real-world effectiveness and safety of 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in treatment-naive Canadian individuals with hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis.Patients & methods: Analysis of Canadian people enrolled in the CREST study. Primary end point was sustained virologic response at posttreatment Week 12 (SVR12) rates; safety end points were also assessed.Results: Fifty-three individuals received ≥1 dose of G/P. In the modified analysis set (MAS; which excluded those who discontinued G/P [n = 1] or with missing SVR12 data [n = 12]), 98% (39/40) achieved SVR12; 1 person experienced virologic failure. No individuals experienced or discontinued treatment due to a serious adverse event.Conclusion: In this real-world Canadian cohort, 8-week G/P was well tolerated, with SVR12 rates similar to those in clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture VirologySame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207