Design of Cloud Computing System–Based Pollution Distribution Map in Iraq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Air pollution is widespread in the world and is considered one of the most important risk factors in Iraq, especially as a result of the lack of a green belt surrounding cities and the many causes of pollution, including traffic congestion, the spread of gas power plants and other causes of pollution. The most common factors of pollution in the air are the spread of gases that are harmful to human health, including monoxide, carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone and the spread of dust, which directly affects human health. A smart system has been proposed to measure levels of pollutants, of which carbon monoxide (CO), dioxide and dust are at the forefront. Several cities, including Baghdad, Karbala, Najaf and Hilla, were chosen to measure the percentage of disparity between pollutants in these cities, determine the percentage of CO2 on Google maps for these cities and update the data instantly by sending the data via the cloud computing. The implemented system consists of an Arduino Uno, a (MG811) sensor to measure CO2, a (MQ‐2) sensor to CO and a (DSM501A PM2.5) sensor to measure air quality and the percentage of dust in the atmosphere. The data was also sent via the (Time4vps) cloud computing so that the data were updated instantly. The results obtained showed a difference in the percentage of pollutants between cities and different periods during one day and in one city. The proposed system is very successful to ministry of health if it is implemented in all cities and all the regions of cities around the country because it gives the alert to make all health organizations ready to receipt the higher number of patients in the emergency cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".