MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403766983 · doi:10.3390/fi16110391

Empowering Healthcare: TinyML for Precise Lung Disease Classification

2024· article· en· W4403766983 on OpenAlexaff
Youssef Abadade, Nabil Benamar, Miloud Bagaa, Habiba Chaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Internet · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHealth careDiseaseArtificial intelligenceMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Respiratory diseases such as asthma pose significant global health challenges, necessitating efficient and accessible diagnostic methods. The traditional stethoscope is widely used as a non-invasive and patient-friendly tool for diagnosing respiratory conditions through lung auscultation. However, it has limitations, such as a lack of recording functionality, dependence on the expertise and judgment of physicians, and the absence of noise-filtering capabilities. To overcome these limitations, digital stethoscopes have been developed to digitize and record lung sounds. Recently, there has been growing interest in the automated analysis of lung sounds using Deep Learning (DL). Nevertheless, the execution of large DL models in the cloud often leads to latency, dependency on internet connectivity, and potential privacy issues due to the transmission of sensitive health data. To address these challenges, we developed Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) models for the real-time detection of respiratory conditions by using lung sound recordings, deployable on low-power, cost-effective devices like digital stethoscopes. We trained three machine learning models—a custom CNN, an Edge Impulse CNN, and a custom LSTM—on a publicly available lung sound dataset. Our data preprocessing included bandpass filtering and feature extraction through Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs). We applied quantization techniques to ensure model efficiency. The custom CNN model achieved the highest performance, with 96% accuracy and 97% precision, recall, and F1-scores, while maintaining moderate resource usage. These findings highlight the potential of TinyML to provide accessible, reliable, and real-time diagnostic tools, particularly in remote and underserved areas, demonstrating the transformative impact of integrating advanced AI algorithms into portable medical devices. This advancement facilitates the prospect of automated respiratory health screening using lung sounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture InternetSame topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207