Air quality prediction and control systems using machine learning and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately predicting air quality concentrations is a challenging task due to the complex interactions of pollutants and their reliance on nonlinear processes. This study introduces an innovative approach in environmental engineering, employing artificial intelligence techniques to forecast air quality in Semnan, Iran. Comprehensive data on seven different pollutants was initially collected and analyzed. Then, several machine learning (ML) models were rigorously evaluated for their performance, and a detailed analysis was conducted. By incorporating these advanced technologies, the study aims to create a reliable framework for air quality prediction, with a particular focus on the case study in Iran. The results indicated that the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) was the most effective method for predicting air quality across different seasons, showing high reliability across all datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it