MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403777039 · doi:10.1111/cgf.15209

A TransISP Based Image Enhancement Method for Visual Disbalance in Low‐light Images

2024· article· en· W4403777039 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaqi Wu, Jing Guo, Rui Jing, Shihao Zhang, Zijian Tian, Wei Chen, Zehua Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Image enhancementComputer graphics (images)Visualization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Existing image enhancement algorithms often fail to effectively address issues of visual disbalance, such as brightness unevenness and color distortion, in low‐light images. To overcome these challenges, we propose a TransISP‐based image enhancement method specifically designed for low‐light images. To mitigate color distortion, we design dual encoders based on decoupled representation learning, which enable complete decoupling of the reflection and illumination components, thereby preventing mutual interference during the image enhancement process. To address brightness unevenness, we introduce CNNformer, a hybrid model combining CNN and Transformer. This model efficiently captures local details and long‐distance dependencies between pixels, contributing to the enhancement of brightness features across various local regions. Additionally, we integrate traditional image signal processing algorithms to achieve efficient color correction and denoising of the reflection component. Furthermore, we employ a generative adversarial network (GAN) as the overarching framework to facilitate unsupervised learning. The experimental results show that, compared with six SOTA image enhancement algorithms, our method obtains significant improvement in evaluation indexes (e.g., on LOL, PSNR: 15.59%, SSIM: 9.77%, VIF: 9.65%), and it can improve visual disbalance defects in low‐light images captured from real‐world coal mine underground scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Graphics ForumSame topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207