The Quest for Gender Equality in Canada: Introduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The collective publication, titled Canada: A Model for Gender Equality?, highlights the work of emerging scholars as the project is conducted by the Students’ Association for American Studies. The Students’ Association prioritizes the promotion of Canadian cultures in Poland among its primary objectives. This interdisciplinary publication comprises 15 chapters, addressing various issues with a primary focus on feminism and women’s rights in Canada. It analyzes the notion of gender equality through an examination of governmental programs, literary works, and social initiatives. It also discusses the challenges faced by marginalized groups, including women of Indigenous descent, immigrant women, and 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals. The book highlights legislative progress and the necessity to continue striving for comprehensive gender equality in social, political, and economic spheres. The historical context of gender equality initiatives in Canada was examined, highlighting the contributions of Canada’s feminist movements that facilitated women’s advancement in male-dominated arenas. The book underscores the need for further reforms to tackle the pervasive systemic barriers and discrimination that persistently affect the lives of many women and individuals of diverse gender identities in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".