Bibliographic record
Abstract
Labrador teas are a small but systematically complex group of species of the Ericaceae family. The group is represented by cold-resistant evergreen shrubs, common in the boreal and subarctic zones of the northern hemisphere, both in Eurasia and North America. Described historically as part of the distinct genus Ledum L., Labrador teas were later included in the genus Rhododendron as a subsection Ledum in subgenus Rhododendron. The high variability of morphological characters, their dependence on geographical and environmental factors, makes it difficult to clearly distinguish from 4 to 9 described taxa. Labrador teas play a key ecological role as dominants in damp communities of temperate and cold climates and are often pioneers in successional communities of disturbed habitats. This species complex is also interesting as a model group for studying the processes of hybridization and diversification, since different species tend to coexist in sympatry, especially in northeast Asia. This review summarizes the results of studying the species diversity of Labrador teas, mainly in Northeast Asia, changes in their taxonomy and hypotheses of origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".