Advancing Micro-Action Recognition with Multi-Auxiliary Heads and Hybrid Loss Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Video action recognition has been a hot research direction in computer vision, with most existing technologies focusing on coarse-grained macro-action recognition. However, fine-grained action recognition remains challenging. Micro-actions, characterized by high fine-grained, low-intensity, and brief, are crucial for emotion recognition and psychological assessment applications. In this paper, we build on popular video action recognition frameworks as foundation models, introducing multi-auxiliary heads and hybrid loss optimization to advance micro-action recognition. Specifically, the Frame-Level pred and Coarse-Grained Body-Action auxiliary heads work collaboratively to enhance the model and Fine-Grained Micro-Action primary head for perceiving fine-grained and capturing keyframes. Incorporating F1 loss, ArcFace loss, and weighted multi-task loss improves training stability, convergence speed, and performance. Additionally, integrating the optical flow modality enriches the model's diversity, and ensemble learning across all foundational models. Finally, our method achieves a 75.37% F1-mean on the MA-52 dataset, ranking 1st in the Micro-Action Analysis Grand Challenge in conjunction with ACM MM'24. The code is available at https://github.com/qklee-lz/ACMMM2024-MAC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".