Profiling Breast Tumor Heterogeneity and Identifying Breast Cancer Subtypes Through Tumor‐Associated Immune Cell Signatures and Immuno Nano Sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breast cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease with varying cellular, genetic, epigenetic, and molecular expressions. The detection of intratumor heterogeneity in breast cancer poses significant challenges due to its complex multifaceted characteristics, yet its identification is crucial for guiding effective treatment decisions and understanding the disease progression. Currently, there exists no method capable of capturing the full extent of breast tumor heterogeneity. In this study, the aim is to identify and characterize metabolic heterogeneity in breast tumors using immune cells and an ultrafast laser-fabricated Immuno Nano Sensor. Combining spectral markers from both Natural Killer (NK) and T cells, a machine-learning approach is implemented to distinguish cancer from healthy samples, identify primary versus metastatic tumors, and determine estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status at the single-cell level. The platform successfully distinguished heterogeneous breast cancer samples from healthy individuals, achieving 97.8% sensitivity and 92.2% specificity, and accurately identified primary tumors from metastatic tumors. Characteristic spectral signatures allow for discrimination between ER/PR-positive and negative tumors with 97.5% sensitivity. This study demonstrates the potential of immune cell-based metabolic profiling in providing a comprehensive assessment of breast tumor heterogeneity and paving the way for minimally invasive liquid biopsy approaches in breast cancer diagnosis and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".