StarStream: Live Video Analytics over Space Networking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Streaming videos from resource-constrained front-end devices over networks to resource-rich cloud servers has long been a common practice for surveillance and analytics. Most existing live video analytics (LVA) systems, however, have been built over terrestrial networks, limiting their applications during natural disasters and in remote areas that desperately call for real-time visual data delivery and scene analysis. With the recent advent of space networking, in particular, Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations such as Starlink, high-speed truly global Internet access is becoming available and affordable. This paper examines the challenges and potentials of LVA over modern LEO satellite networking (LSN). Using Starlink as the testbed, we have carried out extensive in-the-wild measurements to gain insights into its achievable performance for LVA. The results reveal that the uplink bottleneck in today's LSN, together with the volatile network conditions, can significantly affect the service quality of LVA and necessitate prompt adaptation. We accordingly develop StarStream, a novel LSN-adaptive streaming framework for LVA. At its core, StarStream is empowered by a Transformer-based network performance predictor tailored for LSN and a content-aware configuration optimizer. We discuss a series of key design and implementation issues of StarStream and demonstrate its effectiveness and superiority through trace-driven experiments with real-world network and video processing data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".