MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403792789 · doi:10.1155/2024/7129562

Vehicle Lane Change Multistep Trajectory Prediction Based on Data and CNN_BiLSTM Model

2024· article· en· W4403792789 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shijie Gao, Zhimin Zhao, Xinjian Liu, Yanli Jiao, Chunyang Song, Jiandong Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTrajectoryComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to accurately predict the lane‐changing trajectory of the vehicle and improve the driving safety of the vehicle, a lane‐changing trajectory prediction model based on the combination of convolutional neural network (CNN) and bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) neural network is proposed by comprehensively considering the historical driving behavior, the spatial characteristics of surrounding vehicles and the bidirectional time sequence information of the vehicle trajectory. Firstly, the vehicle trajectory data are filtered and smoothed, and it is divided into three categories: left lane change, right lane change, and straight driving, and a lane change trajectory sample set is constructed. Secondly, CNN‐BiLSTM model is constructed to identify the sample set of lane‐changing trajectory. Considering the interaction between vehicles in the driving process, the information of predicted vehicle, and surrounding vehicles is taken as the input of the model. The extracted feature vector is input to the BiLSTM layer for prediction after the CNN layer feature extraction, and the horizontal and vertical coordinates of the target vehicle at the next time are output. Thirdly, the trajectory data of the US‐101 dataset in NGSIM is selected to verify the performance of the CNN‐BiLSTM model, and at the same time, it is compared with models such as CNN‐LSTM, long short‐term memory (LSTM), BiLSTM, and CNN‐GRU‐Att. Finally, the verification result shows that the overall fitting degree of the vehicle lane change trajectory prediction of the proposed model reaches 99.50%, and the mean square error and mean absolute error are 0.0003076 and 0.01417, which are improved compared with other models. In the meanwhile, the research on multistep trajectory prediction in different prediction time domains is carried out. It was found that the longer the prediction time domain is, the lower the prediction performance of the model decreases, but the prediction accuracy still reached more than 96%, and it was able to accurately predict the lane change trajectory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207