MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403792939 · doi:10.1163/25425552-20240009

The Principle of Suspension (badha) in Early Mimamsa: the Case of prapta- and apraptabadha

2024· article· en· W4403792939 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Ferrante, Elisa Freschi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of South Asian Intellectual History · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuspension (topology)ChemistryPhysicsCardiologyMedicineMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article examines the notion of bādha or ‘suspension’, one of the primary hermeneutical devices the Mīmāṃsā school of Sanskrit philosophy implemented to avoid seeming clashes between different commands of the Veda. Through bādha , a Vedic injunction can temporarily be suspended to allow for the unchallenged application of another. In all other cases, the first command remains valid, and its authority is therefore not undermined. This essay analyses the history of the device within early Mīmāṃsā, elaborates on how to decide which of two clashing commands should be suspended, and examines the crucial distinction between a suspension of something ‘obtained’ and that of something that is ‘not obtained yet’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of South Asian Intellectual HistorySame topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207