3-Dimensional numerical analysis of geosynthetic double-encased annulus stone columns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A geosynthetic double-encapsulated annulus stone column technique is proposed in this study to overcome limitations associated with conventional stone columns, such as limited lateral load-bearing capacity and potential issues related to aggregate dispersion in soft soils. Geosynthetic double-encapsulated annulus stone columns are consistent with conventional stone columns besides being confined in and around the surrounding soil. The performance of geosynthetic double-encapsulated annulus stone columns is primarily dependent upon their outer-to-inner diameter ratio. For this reason, comprehensive 3-dimensional numerical studies were carried out to evaluate the optimum outer-to-inner diameter ratio of the annulus stone column. The results suggest that the ultimate load-carrying capacity of an annulus stone column increases with an increasing ratio of outer to inner diameter until an optimum value. In addition, the double encapsulation enhances confinement, improving shear stiffness and reducing lateral bulging. However, the load-carrying capacity was substantially reduced beyond the critical outer-to-inner diameter ratio. A simple analytical model extending the theory of thin cylinders is also introduced to estimate the accumulated stresses and strains in the geosynthetic encasement. The proposed model operates within a simplified framework of elastic solutions that facilitate practising engineers to design and optimize geosynthetic encasements for enhanced structural performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".