MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403798180

Multi-Gateway LoRaWAN Throughput Modeling in Direct-to-Satellite IoT Constellations

2024· preprint· en· W4403798180 on OpenAlex
Santiago Henn, Juan A. Fraire, Nicola Accettura, Sandra Céspedes, Holger Hermanns

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Commission
KeywordsConstellationInternet of ThingsGateway (web page)ThroughputSatelliteComputer scienceDefault gatewayComputer networkDistributed computingTelecommunicationsEmbedded systemWirelessEngineeringAerospace engineeringWorld Wide WebPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div> The emerging paradigm of Direct-to-Satellite Internet of Things (DtS-IoT) heralds a new era of global IoT connectivity unlocked by gateways in Low-Earth Orbit (LEO). Among the spectrum of technologies for achieving DtS-IoT, LoRaWAN, which relies on duty-cycled ALOHA channel access over unlicensed bands, emerges as a promising candidate. Lo-RaWAN's broad adoption in terrestrial IoT applications paves the way for a seamless Space-Terrestrial IoT integration. Lo-RaWAN distinctively allows multiple gateways to receive uplink packets simultaneously, an appealing feature for proliferated DtS-IoT constellations leveraging multiple satellites. However, existing theoretical throughput models for static multi-gateway LoRaWAN systems have not been evaluated in the more complex and dynamic satellite context. Our study addresses this gap by adapting, extending, and fine-tuning throughput models for the multi-gateway LEO DtS-IoT scenario. This approach will enable the rapid analysis of various LoRaWAN constellations to optimize their performance, addressing a critical need in current DtS-IoT mission design and operations. Additionally, we validate the proposed modeling with a comprehensive and realistic simulation campaign. Differences between the model predictions and simulation results remain below 5%. Results show that the proposed modeling is accurate and insightful, offering valuable projections into the performance of forthcoming LoRaWAN DtS-IoT constellations. </div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it