MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403805808 · doi:10.1111/rge.12341

Genesis of sediment‐hosted copper and silver mineralization at the Omatapati prospect, Kaoko Belt, Opuwo district, Kunene region, Namibia

2024· article· en· W4403805808 on OpenAlexaff
Abner Nghoongoloka, Ryohei Takahashi, Pearlyn Manalo, Andrea Agangi, Hinako Sato, Helke Mocke, Manuel Nopeia, Nigel Blamey, Tavis Enno, R. J. Bowell

Bibliographic record

VenueResource Geology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityWestern University
FundersJapan International Cooperation Agency
KeywordsGeologyMineralization (soil science)GeochemistryCopperSedimentGeomorphologySoil scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Omatapati copper and silver prospect within the Kaoko Belt is located in the Opuwo district, Kunene region, Namibia. The prospect is hosted by dolomite and interbedded argillites of the Neoproterozoic Devede Formation, the Ombombo Subgroup. An ore body is exposed in shallow artisanal mining pits and drill‐cores of the prospect have grades of 0.4 to 5.2 wt% Cu, and 23 to 312 g/t Ag. The prospect was formed by both hypogene and supergene mineralization processes. The hypogene mineralization occurred in three stages. Stage 1 is represented by calcite veins containing chalcopyrite, bornite, sphalerite and galena. Stage 2 consists of quartz and calcite veins with chalcopyrite and bornite. Stage 3 consists of quartz‐calcite‐barite veins with chalcopyrite. The veins of stages 1 and 2 are subparallel or discordant to the foliation of argillites, and those of Stage 3 are NE‐striking and steeply dipping in the brecciated dolostone and argillite. The mineralization stages 1, 2, and 3 are overprinted by supergene chalcocite, digenite, annite, covellite, malachite, delafossite, hematite, and goethite. The supergene process forms a semi‐massive chalcocite‐covellite zone, which extends from the surface to ~50 m depth. The veins show average concentrations of 2.1 wt% Cu, 80 ppm Ag, and 532 ppm Pb for the stage 1, 3.1 wt% Cu, 118 ppm Ag, and 66 ppm Pb for the stage 2, and 18.6 wt% Cu, 675 ppm Ag, and 565 ppm Pb for the Stage 3 with supergene overprinting. Silver occurs as impurity in supergene chalcocite (6303 ppm Ag), digenite (4425 ppm Ag), and covellite (3060 ppm Ag). Fluid inclusions in quartz and calcite revealed that the hypogene mineralization occurred under a pressure >7–8 MPa. Temperatures of ore formation of the stages 1, 2, and 3 were >145–155 °C, >290–300 °C, and >190–230 °C, respectively. Large variation of salinities in each fluid inclusion assemblage suggests fluid mixing and dilution processes. Fluid inclusion gas compositions in the Stage 3 have weighted means of 98.98 mol% H2O, 0.75 mol% N2, 0.52 mol% CO2, 0.02 mol% CH4, 0.0021 mol% Ar, 0.0009 mol% H2S, and 0.00006 mol% He and indicate a signature of magmatic fluids mixed with meteoric waters or seawater. δ34SCDT values of sulfides in the stages 1, 2, and 3 in the prospect have three data clusters, (1) near 0 ‰ of chalcopyrite in the stages 1 and 2, (2) near −11 ‰ of bornite in the stage 2, and (3) +5 to +11 ‰ of the supergene chalcocite and covellite. Modes of occurrence of ores, fluid inclusions and sulfur isotope data show that the prospect is likely the same type as sediment‐hosted copper‐silver deposits with veining found in the Central African Copperbelt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResource GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207