MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403807662 · doi:10.5539/jel.v14n2p53

Approach to Mental Disorders in Dental Education in a Brazilian State

2024· article· en· W4403807662 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ivana Márcia Alves Diniz, Lia Silva de Castilho, Ênio Lacerda Vilaça, Frederico Santos Lages, Danilo Rocha Dias

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsPsychologyState (computer science)Mathematics educationClinical psychologyPedagogyMedical educationMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oral diseases present higher prevalence in people with mental disorders, which makes dental care a possible means for screening and referral to mental health specialized care. Because some dental conditions can be caused by or associated with mental disorders, dentists can identify patients’ mental health care needs. However, they have shown low confidence and a lack of training in dealing with mental health patients, which may indicate a deficiency in the approach to mental disorders in dental education. This study aimed to verify whether undergraduate Dentistry courses in a Brazilian state introduce knowledge about adult mental disorders into their curriculum content. The courses operating in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, were assessed by information available at the e-MEC system, the official database of courses and Higher Education Institutions in Brazil, and at institutions’ websites. Two researchers independently assessed pedagogical projects, curriculum matrices, syllabi, and teaching plans. Psychology disciplines Applied Psychology and Psychology-related were identified, and their syllabi and teaching plans were screened, searching for themes related to mental disorders and/or psychopathology. Of the 73 courses included, 34 were evaluated, and only five courses presented disciplines with some approach to mental disorders and/or psychopathology. The results showed that a large part of undergraduate Dentistry courses assessed do not address knowledge about adult mental disorders as part of dental education. Considering the impact of mental disorders on oral and systemic health, it is important to reflect on the role of dentists in mental health care and on the responsibility of Higher Education Institutions regarding the development of skills and competencies of these professionals. The results of this study draw attention to the need to address adult mental disorders in dental education, reinforcing mental health as an important aspect of patients’ general health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education and Learning→Same topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout→French-language works237,207→