MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biomimetic porphyrin-lipid nanoparticles - novel nanoscale theranostics for multimodal imaging and therapy in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

2024· article· en· W4403808876 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria Nankivell, Lauren Sandeman, Liam Stretton, Achini K. Vidanapathirana, Maneesha A. Rajora, Jiankun Chen, William Tieu, Peter J. Psaltis, Joanne T. M. Tan, Yangchao Chen, Karlheinz Peter, Gang Zheng, Christina A. Bursill

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePorphyrinNanoscopic scaleAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseNanoparticleDiseaseNanotechnologyPathologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background High-density lipoprotein (HDL) mimetic nanoagents have unrealized potential for atherosclerosis theranostics. Porphyrin-lipid HDL mimetic nanoparticles (Por-HDL-NPs) incorporate a porphyrin-lipid conjugate which permits near infrared fluorescence imaging and positron emission tomography (PET) through chelation of Copper-64 (64Cu). The outer shell contains apolipoprotein A-I mimetic peptide R4F designed to interact with scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), enabling macrophage-targeting and therapeutic effects. Purpose To investigate the multimodal imaging, macrophage-targeting and therapeutic properties of Por-HDL-NPs and applications in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods In vitro, the cholesterol efflux capacity of PBS (control), reconstituted HDL (rHDL) and Por-HDL-NPs was determined in immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophages (iBMDMs) loaded with [³H]-cholesterol. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assessed mRNA levels of inflammatory mediators. ELISAs and Western blotting measured changes in protein levels. Apolipoprotein (Apo)e-/- mice were fed high-cholesterol diet (HCD) for 6 weeks, for early-stage plaque, and 13 weeks for the unstable plaque model in which two partial stenoses were made in the right carotid artery. PET and fluorescence (IVIS, flow cytometry, microscopy) imaging identified Por-HDL-NPs in plaques, circulating and aortic cells. Histological techniques assessed plaque area and composition in aortic sinus and carotid artery sections. Results Por-HDL-NPs were internalized by iBMDMs, visualized via fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Por-HDL-NPs increased cholesterol efflux (49%, P<0.05), compared to rHDL. Por-HDL-NPs reduced macrophage mRNA levels of Il-1b (88%), Il-18 (54%) and Ccl5 (75%), and protein secretion of IL-1β (69%) and CCL5 (82%), P<0.05. Por-HDL-NPs suppressed inflammasome components Nlrp3 (69%) and Asc (36%), and activation of inflammatory transcription factor p65-NF-κB (53%), P<0.05. SR-BI siRNA knockdown and methyl-β-cyclodextrin, revealed that the anti-inflammatory properties of Por-HDL-NPs were independent of SR-BI and cholesterol efflux. In Apoe-/- mice, PET imaging showed 64Cu-Por-HDL-NPs localized in hearts and could detect increases in plaque size over time with HCD feeding. Por-HDL-NP fluorescence was detected within aortic sinus and unstable carotid plaques, co-localized with CD68+ macrophages. Por-HDL-NP-treated mice had smaller early-stage (22%) and unstable plaques (52%) than control PBS-treated mice, P<0.05. Por-HDL-NP mice had fewer circulating (32%) and aortic monocytes (81%), and a reduction in aortic arch Rela (26%), P<0.05. Conclusions Por-HDL-NPs present as potential nanoscale theranostics for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Por-HDL-NPs can detect plaques using multiple imaging modalities and exhibit atheroprotective effects.Atherosclerosis imaging with Por-HDL-NPs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207