Multi-view learning framework for predicting unknown types of cancer markers via directed graph neural networks fitting regulatory networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers for complex diseases, especially cancer, has always been a central and long-term challenge in molecular association prediction research, offering promising avenues for advancing the understanding of complex diseases. To this end, researchers have developed various network-based prediction techniques targeting specific molecular associations. However, limitations imposed by reductionism and network representation learning have led existing studies to narrowly focus on high prediction efficiency within single association type, thereby glossing over the discovery of unknown types of associations. Additionally, effectively utilizing network structure to fit the interaction properties of regulatory networks and combining specific case biomarker validations remains an unresolved issue in cancer biomarker prediction methods. To overcome these limitations, we propose a multi-view learning framework, CeRVE, based on directed graph neural networks (DGNN) for predicting unknown type cancer biomarkers. CeRVE effectively extracts and integrates subgraph information through multi-view feature learning. Subsequently, CeRVE utilizes DGNN to simulate the entire regulatory network, propagating node attribute features and extracting various interaction relationships between molecules. Furthermore, CeRVE constructed a comparative analysis matrix of three cancers and adjacent normal tissues through The Cancer Genome Atlas and identified multiple types of potential cancer biomarkers through differential expression analysis of mRNA, microRNA, and long noncoding RNA. Computational testing of multiple types of biomarkers for 72 cancers demonstrates that CeRVE exhibits superior performance in cancer biomarker prediction, providing a powerful tool and insightful approach for AI-assisted disease biomarker discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".