MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403811401 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024c4zkjap0

Body Mass Index Trajectories among Adolescents and Young Adults with CKD

2024· article· en· W4403811401 on OpenAlexaff
Pierina Parraga, Caleb Easterly, Guido Filler, Donna Gilleskie, María Ferris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBody mass indexMedicineIndex (typography)Young adultGerontologyPediatricsDemographyInternal medicineSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nearly 1 in 5 US children and adolescents have obesity, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We examine longitudinal body mass index (BMI) patterns among adolescents and young adults (AYA) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during the age of transition to adulthood. Methods: We conducted an historical cohort study of AYA with CKD stages 1-5 aged 13-25 at a southeastern health system in the USA. Electronic medical record (EMR) appointment and laboratory data from Jan 2005-May 2015 were extracted, and CKD patients with ≥4 height and weight measurements were included (N=7,978 observations from 255 patients). Age- and sex-specific BMI Z-scores and percentiles were calculated using the 2000 CDC growth chart (normal weight: BMI >5th and <85th percentile; overweight: BMI ≥85th and <95th percentile; obese: BMI >95th percentile). We modeled BMI Z-score as a linear function of age allowing for different intercepts and slopes for adolescents (aged 13-19) and young adults (aged 20-25), adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, birth year, and CKD etiology (glomerular, non-glomerular, other primary diagnosis). Logistic regression estimated the proportion of patients with overweight or obesity by age. Results: At baseline, patients’ mean age was 14.9 years, 53% were male; 35% had glomerular conditions, 32% non-glomerular conditions, and 33% had other primary diagnoses. BMI Z-scores decreased with age among adolescents (-0.066 standard deviations [SD] per year of age; P = 0.022) and increased with age for young adults (0.170 SD per year of age; P < 0.001). The proportion of adolescents with overweight or obesity did not change with age (P = 0.643), but the proportion of young adults with overweight or obesity increased by 0.037 with each year of age (P < 0.001), reaching 0.62 by age 25. Conclusion: Trends in BMI increase as adolescents with CKD move into young adulthood.Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, birth year, and CKD etiology. 95% confidence intervals are shaded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207