Exact Algorithms for Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators, which is the problem of augmenting an n-vertex planar graph whose vertices are partitioned into independent sets (called clusters) with paths - one for each cluster - that connect all the vertices in each cluster while maintaining planarity. We show that the problem can be solved in time 2^𝒪(n) for both the variable and fixed embedding case. Moreover, we show that it can be solved in subexponential time 2^𝒪(√n log n) in the fixed embedding case if additionally the input graph is connected. The latter time complexity is tight under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis. We also show that n can be replaced with the vertex cover number of the input graph by providing a linear (resp. polynomial) kernel for the variable-embedding (resp. fixed-embedding) case; these results contrast the NP-hardness of the problem on graphs of bounded treewidth (and even on trees). Finally, we complement known lower bounds for the problem by showing that Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators is NP-hard even when the number of clusters is at most 3, thus excluding the algorithmic use of the number of clusters as a parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".