MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403812121 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024d7cbrcdb

Canadian Wildfires of 2023 and Risk of Mortality and Hospitalization among ESKD Patients

2024· article· en· W4403812121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hyeonjin Song

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Climate change driven droughts are increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires, a significant source of air pollution. Smoke plumes from the 2023 Canadian wildfires travelled long distances and negatively impacted air quality across large swaths of eastern US. We investigated the association between exposure to 2023 Canadian wildfire-related air pollutants and risk of mortality and hospitalization among hemodialysis patients in New England, the Mid-Atlantic, and the Midwest U.S. Methods: The study population includes the end stage kidney disease patients (N=52,995) receiving hemodialysis treatment at Fresenius Kidney Care clinics located in New England, the Mid-Atlantic, and the Midwest U.S. during June-July 2023. Daily number of all-cause deaths, all-cause hospitalizations, respiratory disease hospitalizations, and cardiovascular disease hospitalizations were counted for each hemodialysis clinic. Presence and absence of wildfire smoke plume and wildfire-related fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration were assessed using both satellite-derived smoke polygons and ground-based PM2.5 monitors. We constructed a retrospective observational study using a time-stratified case-crossover analysis with a conditional quasi-Poisson model to investigate the risk of mortality and hospitalization associated with exposures to wildfire-related air pollutants. Results: Canadian wildfires of 2023 significantly increased air pollution level across the dialysis clinics in the study area, with the highest daily wildfire-related PM2.5 concentration reaching 251.1µg/m3. The presence of wildfire smoke plume was associated with an 18% increase in risk of same day (lag0) all-cause mortality (rate ratio [RR]:1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.24) and a 3% increase in risk of all-cause hospitalization (RR:1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07). A 10-μg/m3 increase in wildfire-related PM2.5 was associated with a 139% increase in same day all-cause mortality (RR: 2.39; 95% CI, 1.79-3.18), and a 33% increase in all-cause hospitalization (RR:1.33; 95% CI, 1.10-1.62). Conclusion: Our data suggest that air pollution from the 2023 Canadian wildfires resulted in increased risk of mortality and hospitalization among hemodialysis patients in New England, the Mid-Atlantic, and the Midwest U.S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→