MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403812437 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024yq57den0

Patient Perspectives on Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis: A National Survey

2024· article· en· W4403812437 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Perl, Arti Dhoot, Michael Spigler, Bruce Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeritoneal dialysisMedicineUrologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) may improve quality of life, reduce therapy burden and ease transition to PD. Incremental approaches for automated PD (APD) include: less than 7 days a week, carrying no daytime dwell, reduced dwell volumes or less time on the cycler. For CAPD, decreasing the exchange frequency or reducing dwell volumes are also strategies. We sought to understand patient preferences for various strategies via the dissemination of a national survey to individuals on PD. Methods: A pilot tested, anonymous, voluntary survey was administered in Aug-Sep 2023. The American Kidney Fund (AKF) distributed the survey via an online link to those receiving charitable assistance from AKF, social media platform, and AKF’s monthly newsletter. The survey was for those over 18 years, on PD now or in the past year, and the goal was “to learn about ways that PD can help patients have a good quality of life”. Descriptive results were analyzed. Results: Of the 564 respondents, 9.6% were aged 18- 39 years, 75.9% between 40-69 years and 23.8% over 70 years with 59.1% females, 62.5% Caucasian, and 15.5% identifying as black. PD was initiated <1 year in 35.1% of patients. Within 6 months of PD-start, 70.6% of patients reported performing PD treatment 7 days a week. Patients ranked various initial preferred PD prescriptions between 1-4, with 1 as most important as shown in figure 1. Less days of PD treatment per week consistently emerged with the highest priority rankings (ranging from 48- 61.2%) among those receiving APD versus reducing to a single daily dwell for CAPD (42.7%). Conclusion: Patients value less days of PD treatment per week or a single daily exchange over other approaches to incremental PD. Days off from PD as a strategy is currently underutilized in most patients at time of PD initiation. Further research should evaluate the safety and feasibility of providing these prescription variations in select incident individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207