MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epigenetic BET inhibitor apabetalone counters inflammatory and fibrotic processes in activated cardiac fibroblasts providing insight into reduced hospitalizations for heart failure in BETonMACE trial

2024· article· en· W4403817699 on OpenAlexaff
Ewelina Kulikowski, Sylwia Wasiak, Dean Gilham, Li Fu, Laura Tsujikawa, Agostina Carestia, Michael Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsResverlogix (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpigeneticsHeart failureInflammationInflammatory responseCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background After myocardial infarction (MI), sustained crosstalk between monocytes and cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) promotes chronic inflammation and interstitial fibrosis that can contribute to heart failure (HF). Resident and myocardium-infiltrating immune cells produce proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα that stimulate CFs to produce monocyte chemoattractants. Monocytes secrete TGF-β1 that transforms CFs into contractile myofibroblasts overproducing the extracellular matrix (ECM) responsible for cardiac fibrosis. Epigenetic BET inhibitors (BETi) reduce CF transdifferentiation to prevent cardiac fibrosis and HF in animal models. In patients with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and recent MI, administration of the BETi apabetalone (APA) resulted in less hospitalization due to HF vs. placebo (BETonMACE phase 3 trial; hazard ratio 0.59, p=0.03). Purpose To examine APA’s in vitro effects on inflammatory and profibrotic processes in CFs associated with cardiac fibrosis and HF. Methods Immortalized and primary human CFs were stimulated with cytokines (10ng/mL IL-1β, TNFα, TGF-β1) or with conditioned media from 10ng/mL IFNγ and 100ng/mL lipopolysaccharide-treated THP-1 macrophages ± 5μM APA on plastic or in 3D collagen gels. Gene expression was analyzed by PCR, protein levels by FACS or ELISA, collagen deposition with picrosirius red, THP-1 monocyte migration in Boyden chambers, and CF contraction with 3D collagen gels. Results IL-1β or TNFα stimulation of CFs upregulated monocyte chemoattractant 1 (CCL2) and vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM1) expression, promoting THP-1 cell migration and adhesion to CFs. APA treatment reduced cytokine-induced CCL2 (>20%) and VCAM1 (>70%) gene expression as well as THP-1 cell migration and adhesion to stimulated CFs (>60%). TGF-β1 treatment induced CF transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts as shown by increased expression of α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) protein, and secretion of ECM proteins fibronectin and periostin. APA treatment reduced myofibroblast mRNA and protein expression of α-SMA (~30%), fibronectin (~30%) and periostin (97%). Myofibroblast-mediated collagen deposition was also reduced by APA by ~20%. α-SMA-dependent CF contraction can be visualized in attached 3D collagen gels. TGF-β1, IL-1β, TNFα or macrophage-conditioned media promoted CF-mediated gel contraction by 2.5, 1.4, 2.1, or 1.8-fold, respectively. APA treatment countered gel contraction by 30-60%, thereby reducing the myofibroblast-like behaviour in organotypic cultures. Conclusions In vitro, APA treatment reduced proinflammatory crosstalk between monocytes and CFs, resulting in less monocyte migration, monocyte - CF adhesion and CF contraction. APA also reduced signaling by TGF-β1, thus reducing profibrotic and contractile behaviour of CFs responsible for cardiac fibrosis. Since fibrosis contributes to HF, this data provides insight into the observed reduction in hospitalization due to HF in the BETonMACE trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207