MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integrated multi-omics predictive analysis of atherosclerosis: a sub-study from the Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism in Diabetic Atherosclerosis (MAGMA) trial

2024· article· en· W4403819207 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Eudes Dazard, Armando Vergara-Martel, Brendan Bourges-Sevenier, Mirela Dobre, Kim A. Connelly, Jonnelle M. Edwards, Juan Gaztañaga, Gonçalo Martins Pereira, Cheryl Cameron, Mark J. Cameron, Sadeer Al‐Kindi, Bertram Pitt, Robert D. Brook, Sanjay Rajagopalan

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMineralocorticoid receptorAntagonismMineralocorticoidInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusReceptorEndocrinologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background/Introduction Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRA) are beneficial in cardiorenal outcomes in randomized controlled trials but the mechanisms are unclear. MAGMA was an NHLBI sponsored randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, 12-month trial comparing Spironolactone (n = 37) vs. placebo (n = 42) in Type 2 diabetics with CKD stages 3-4 on maximal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade and a prior atherosclerotic event and/or left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. The primary outcome of percent (%) change in total aortic wall volume (TWV) at 12 months, measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was significantly reduced by Spironolactone. Purpose/Originality The purpose of this analysis was to understand mechanistic pathways of MRAs using a multi-omics approach that could help tease out molecular mechanisms of benefit. Revealing for the first time which of these integrated pathways are predictive of the primary outcome will help design treatments for targeted interventions. Methods Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients randomized to Spironolactone or placebo at baseline and 3-months were measured for aptamer-based proteomic biomarkers (7,596 proteins) and 10-X platform-based single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq), respectively. Pre-selected candidate predictors were used as inputs of a predictive model of changes of TWV. We fit a Mixed-Multivariate Random Forest (RF) model, a variation of the RF supervised tree-based machine learning method to take the experimental design into account in the regression formulation. The two sources of "omics predictors" were integrated into a supervised multi-omics model to jointly explain the outcome using an extension of Sparse Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis (SGCCA). Integrated multiome functional analyses with graphical visualizations were carried out by statistical enrichment analysis using Over Representation Analysis (ORA) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) against databases of gene ontologies, biological pathways, putative regulatory motifs, proteins, or disease annotations. Results The plasma proteome in response to Spironolactone revealed downregulation of MR targets including fibrosis, immune activation/inflammation, leukocyte activation, proliferation and pathways involved in cytokine stimulation. scRNAseq pathways revealed negative regulation of cytokines production such as IL-2 and redistribution of multiple cell types. Predictors of plaque progression involved cytokine-receptor, complement-coagulation, cell adhesion and axonal guidance targets. Multiome integrated functional analyses results of predictive pathways will be presented. Conclusions The changes in plasma proteomic profile with Spironolactone were consistent with the phenotype of reduced atherosclerosis and downregulation of multiple inflammatory, immune response and profibrotic pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207