Silent cerebral microvascular disease and longitudinal risk of cognitive decline in atrial fibrillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background A relationship between silent stroke and cognitive disorder has recently been suggested in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This research is an exploratory research study to investigate the occurrence of asymptomatic cerebrovascular disorders with NVAF. Methods The SKAF (Silent cerebral microvascular disease and longitudinal risK of cognitive decline in Atrial Fibrillation) study is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, observational study of Japanese patients with NVAF aged 60 years or older. We had planned to enroll two hundred NVAF patients with no history of symptomatic stroke or dementia, and an anticoagulant therapy with edoxaban is being performed or an anticoagulant therapy is not being performed, and one hundred patients with sinus rhythm, for comparison. We collected patient characteristics, clinical course, the data of head MRI test and cognitive function test (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)) at the baseline and the 24 months follow-up. The primary endpoint was the composite of silent ischemic stroke and micro-bleeding over a 24-month follow-up period. The secondary endpoint was cognitive decline over a 24-month follow-up period. Results The study was started in October 2016, with a planned 2-year recruitment period. As of January 31, 2018, a total of 326 patients were enrolled. Of those, 99 patients with sinus rhythm (SR group) and 214 patients with NVAF (NVAF group) were analyzed (male, 193 (62%) patients; age, 72.2±6.5 years). 156 of 195 (80%) patients with NVAF received the anticoagulant therapy with edoxaban. There was no significant difference of the primary composite for the endpoints between two groups (17.4% versus 17.4%; p=1.00). The incidences of silent ischemic stroke and micro-bleeding in SR and NVAF groups over a 24-month follow-up period were 9.3% and 10.8% (p= 0.833), and 8.1% and 9.2% (p=1.00), respectively. The NVAF group exhibited a significantly larger decline in cognition changes in MoCA score than SR group (-0.830 versus 0,000; p=0.0131). Notably, NVAF was found to be associated with cognitive decline. Conclusion The SKAF registry provided an equivalent risk of silent cerebral microvascular disease in patients with SR and NVAF. Clinically, NVAF had an impact on cognitive decline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".