Defibrillator shocks and their effect on objective asian patient outcomes: results of the painfree SST clinical trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduces mortality in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. However, the effect of ICD shock on device-measured activity is unknown. The aim of this analysis was to analyze the acute and long-term effects of ICD shock on objective behavioral data. Methods The PainFree SST study was a prospective, multicenter, global study that enrolled 2770 patients including 225 from from Asia (181 from Japan, 25 from India, and 19 from Malaysia). Patient physical activity was determined from the device built-in accelerometer. The device translates the accelerometer output into a count of active minutes, which is stored as a daily total value in device memory for a rolling window of 425 days. Obviously, activity is measured only after device implantation. Early after implant, activity is reduced due to the procedure and thus not representative. Therefore, no baseline can be reported for activity. The follow-up activity data was analyzed with a linear mixed model, with a random effect for patient and an auto-regressive correlation matrix for subsequent measurements of individual patients. Results Figure 1 shows average daily activity between 90 days before and 90 days after a shock. The dashed vertical line indicates the day of shock. Both patients from Asia and from other countries show a drop in activity after a shock with recovery in the subsequent 30-60 days. The curve for Asian patients is more variable than the curve for other countries due to the lower number of patients (there were 33 Asian patients with shocks contributing data). Figure 2 shows average daily activity before and after ATP therapy. Any post shock measurement is excluded. Contrary to the temporary reduction in activity around a shock (Figure 1), ATP therapies do not seem to have an impact on activity. In patients from the other countries, activity is significantly reduced when patients are hospitalized (-66.3 minutes/day, p<0.0001), but not in Asian patients (-5.1 minutes/day, p=0.71). Both in Asian and other countries, activity is significantly reduced after an ICD shock (Asian: -47.5 minutes/day, p=0.0002; Other countries: -21.5 minutes/day, p<0.0001). The effect of shock for Asian is greater than the other countries (p=0.054). In the month after the shock there is a significant recovery, +34.8 minutes/day in Asian patients (p=0.0077) and +7.7 minutes/day in patients from other countries (p=0.031). The recovery is trended to be bigger in Asian patients (p=0.058). Conclusions ICD shocks have a lasting adverse impact on objective, device-measured physical activity, particularly among Asian individuals. Successful management of patients with an ICD necessitates specific attention to clinically relevant behavioral outcomes, aiming to expedite recovery and facilitate a return to activities of daily living, with a particular focus on the Asian population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".