MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403824656 · doi:10.7202/1113719ar

Les imagiers photographiques : miroir du monde ou monde à part ?

2024· article· fr· W4403824656 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Éléonore Hamaide

Bibliographic record

VenueMémoires du livre · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article esquisse une typologie de l’imagier photographique en le réinscrivant dans une tradition du livre et de l’album documentaire. L’imagier s’est imposé comme un incontournable éditorial dont la diversité des propositions enrichit ses enjeux et ses publics. L’imagier photographique joue du réalisme du médium pour se faire miroir du monde, mais il est aussi une initiation en acte à l’art photographique et une école du regard, par la mise en oeuvre de dispositifs qui orientent la lecture de l’image. La confrontation à des photographes reconnus n’empêche pas une conception ludique de la photographie de se faire jour. L’imagier photographique témoigne enfin d’une évolution du regard sur la littérature de jeunesse également tournée vers des publics adultes par sa capacité à s’ouvrir au monde contemporain et à ses préoccupations sociales et idéologiques autant qu’à ses nouveaux modes de communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMémoires du livreSame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207