An automated approach to health misinformation monitoring on YouTube
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background YouTube is a social media platform associated with large viewership but little research into its role in the propagation of online health misinformation. This study proposes an automated pipeline to facilitate the collection and analysis of health misinformation on YouTube. Methods The pipeline relies on Python and the Youtube Data API. A preliminary test of the proposed pipeline was conducted using two videos from the channel “@BobbyParrish” (5.55M subscribers, 1.5K videos). The pipeline was used to extract two videos with large view counts and comparable like and comment counts. This extraction includes the transcript of the respective videos and engagement metrics. All the comment threads under the videos are also collected with the reply structure preserved. Then, the pipeline employs NLTK’s SentimentIntensityAnalyzer to score each comment for sentiment polarity and classify into positive, negative, or neutral. The pipeline generates visualizations of the sentiment distribution and a frequency-based word cloud of emojis extracted from the text. Results The proposed pipeline passed the test satisfactorily. It was able to retrieve channel statistics and metrics associated with the videos on the channel. It also successfully extracted the transcript and complete comments of the videos while preserving the integrity of the reply structure found on YouTube. Automated analyses of the data resulted in comprehensive and accessible visualizations. Conclusions The proposed work has the potential to facilitate large-scale studies into the propagation of health misinformation on YouTube. Moreover, it can be used by public health officials to rapidly address viral videos spreading health misinformation through social inoculation. Future work includes integrating topic modelling and automatic classification of health misinformation in the analysis portion of the pipeline. Key messages • The pipeline offers public health officials and researchers a rapid tool to identify and analyze health misinformation on YouTube, facilitating timely interventions. • The pipeline enhances the ability to monitor and respond to evolving public health misinformation trends, by automating the extraction and sentiment analysis of YouTube data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".