MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403825190 · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.012

Dexmedetomidine decreases cerebral hyperperfusion incidence following carotid stenting: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial

2024· article· en· W4403825190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMed · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersHenan Provincial Science and Technology Research ProjectNatural Science Foundation of Henan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDexmedetomidineMedicineCarotid stentingAnesthesiaRandomized controlled trialDouble blindIncidence (geometry)CardiologyInternal medicineCarotid arteriesCarotid endarterectomyMathematicsPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: adrenoceptor agonist with sedative, analgesic, and neuroprotective properties. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ChiCTR1900024416) aims to investigate whether prophylactic low-dose Dex decreases CH-induced brain injury following CAS. METHODS: After obtaining written informed consent, patients aged 18-80 who underwent CAS were enrolled between July 2019 and October 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous Dex (0.1 μg/kg/h, until post-operative day 3) (n = 80) or placebo (normal saline) (n = 80). The primary endpoint was the incidence of CH and CHS assessed up to the third post-operative day. The secondary endpoints included National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores within 30 days of operation, extubation time, discharge from the hospital within 7 days post-operation, length of hospital stay post-operation, and all-cause 30-day mortality. Blood samples were collected before and after surgery for lipidomics, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and neurofilament light chain (Nfl) measurements. Acceptability, safety, and efficacy were evaluated by Cox model and logistic model. FINDINGS: CH occurred in 30 (37.5%) of 80 patients who received a placebo compared to 9 (11.2%) of 80 patients given Dex (prevalence: odds ratio [OR]: 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.088-0.467; p < 0.001; incidence: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.14-0.50; p < 0.001). CHS was significantly higher in the placebo group (13.75%) than in the Dex group (2.5%) (prevalence: [OR]: 0.161, 95% CI: 0.024-0.626; p = 0.020; incidence: [HR]: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.52; p = 0.009). Dex significantly upregulated BDNF, decreased Nfl, and uniquely increased lysophosphatidylethanolamine. CONCLUSIONS: A low prophylactic dose of Dex significantly reduced the incidence of CH and CHS up to 72 h after CAS. FUNDING: This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 82271288) and the Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (nos. 242300421192 and JQRC2023004).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it