MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403827183 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3486787

A Multitask CNN-Transformer Network for Semantic Change Detection From Bitemporal Remote Sensing Images

2024· article· en· W4403827183 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Liu, Jiawei Liu, Yongtao Yu, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceChange detectionRemote sensingTransformerArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bitemporal remote sensing (RS) semantic change detection (SCD) involves discerning and categorizing changes in the same geographical area across two RS images taken at different times. High-performance SCD approaches typically address this task using multitask networks that simultaneously handle binary change detection (BCD) and semantic segmentation (SS). Despite significant advancements in SCD research, constructing a multitask network that fully explores the correlation between BCD and SS remains challenging. To address this, we propose a novel approach called the multitask CNN-transformer network (MCTNet), tailored for SCD using bitemporal RS images. Our Siamese network simultaneously tackles SS and BCD via three subnetworks: two for SS and one for BCD. The methodology begins with a multiscale convolutional neural network (CNN) extracting local features from input images, and converting them into tokens. A Transformer module with an encoder-decoder architecture then captures long-range dependencies among these visual tokens. The extracted features are subsequently passed to multitask heads, generating predicted outputs. To ensure that the BCD results remain consistent regardless of the order of images in the input pair, we introduce spatiotemporal feature learning (SFL), enabling the acquisition of temporal-symmetric representations for BCD. Extensive experimental validation on the WHU-CD, SECOND, and HRSCD datasets demonstrates the effectiveness and efficiency of MCTNet for both SS and BCD tasks. The source code for this article will be published on GitHub in the futurehttps://github.com/kangziwen1/MCTNet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207