Des balises à la réflexivité : portrait des autoévaluations post-stage en formation des enseignant·e·s
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que l'écriture d'une autoévaluation post-stage soit couramment utilisée en formation pour favoriser le développement professionnel des futur·e·s enseignant·e·s, elle demeure insuffisamment explorée. Ce manque de documentation est particulièrement notable concernant les moyens de soutien déployés pour faire de cette pratique un réel levier d'apprentissage. Notre étude propose une analyse des balises orientant l'autoévaluation post-stage. À travers une analyse de contenu portant sur 66 balises récoltées auprès des instituts de formation à l'enseignement primaire en Belgique francophone, nous avons mis en lumière les tâches prescrites, telles que l'activation de l'autoréflexion par la complétion d'un canevas, la rédaction d'un texte libre et/ou le remplissage d'une grille critériée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it