MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403831947 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024xaa3xxd4

Retrace-Clustering Creatinine Trajectory and Baseline Features for Predicting ESKD

2024· article· en· W4403831947 on OpenAlexaff
Dearbháil Ní Catháin, Jamsheela Nazeer, James Ng, Jennifer Scott, Eithne Muireann Nic an Riogh, Angel Mary George, Arthur G. White, Mark A. Little

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatinineBaseline (sea)TrajectoryCluster analysisInternal medicineMedicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) may experience end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and mortality. We aim to investigate the connection between the longitudinal trajectory of creatinine and the occurrence of ESKD and mortality. Methods: We included patients with a minimum of two creatinine measurements, encompassing the baseline period and the following six months (Figure). Creatinine trajectories were formulated using six months of creatinine readings from AAV patients with kidney involvement. We excluded patients who presented with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In instances where a patient had multiple creatinine values within a given month, the average of those values was employed. Percentage delta creatinine values, representing the percentage difference between a creatinine value and its baseline, were then calculated. The K-means algorithm for longitudinal data was employed to cluster the creatinine trajectories of AAV patients. The quality of clustering was evaluated using the Calinski-Harabasz Index. We conducted a time-to-event analysis for ESKD and death, assessing the survival rates of the clusters over a five-year follow-up period through Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis. Results: The study incorporates 273 patients with >1 creatinine values, amounting to a total of 2022 creatinine readings. We identified three renal trajectory groups: A-Stable (140), B-Recovered (N=100), and C- Declining (N=33). The baseline features varied across clusters, specifically in terms of baseline creatinine (284uM, 390uM and 151uM respectively, p<0.001) and ENT involvement (p=0.001). When considering the composite outcome of ESKD and death, Cluster A exhibited a 3-year incidence rate of 23%, Cluster B at 8%, and Cluster C at 28% (p<0.0069). Conclusion: Trajectory clustering allows for the identification of patients who may require closer monitoring, or targeted interventions based on their cluster assignment and associated risk profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207